What it is:
Annual reports that track housing delivery, 5YHLS position, and Local Plan performance.
How EHDC should use it:
Specifically name and track developers/landowners who fail to progress permitted or allocated land.
Highlight speculative applications that bypass allocated land in the same ownership.
Impact:
Builds public and policy case for deallocation, refusal, or reform. Increases pressure for delivery.
🏡 What Is an “Authority Monitoring Report”?
Every year, councils have to publish a report showing:
- How many homes were actually built,
- Whether the Local Plan is being followed,
- Which developers are keeping up — and who isn’t.
This is called an Authority Monitoring Report (AMR). It’s the Council’s report card — but it can also be a spotlight on developers.
🧭 What Should EHDC Do With This Tool?
- Name the landowners or developers who’ve had permission for years but haven’t built,
- Show where allocated land is sitting idle,
- Use that evidence to say: “You’ve had your chance. You’re not delivering. You don’t get more land until you do.”
🎯 Why Does It Matter?
Without public tracking, there’s:
- No accountability,
- No way to explain rising targets,
- And developers can blame the Council, when they’re the ones not delivering.
✅ Final Thought
This isn’t about shaming for the sake of it — it’s about being honest:
“You asked for this land. You got it. The community accepted it. Now build.”
AMRs give EHDC the facts to push back — in planning meetings, in appeals, and in public.