What it is:
A formal policy that allows EHDC to consider removing sites from the Local Plan if they remain undelivered beyond a reasonable period.
How EHDC should use it:
Include in the Local Plan a review trigger (e.g. “If no application is made within 3 years of adoption, the site may be reconsidered.”)
Impact:
Puts landowners on notice: allocation is not indefinite.
🏡 What Is a “Site Deallocation Review”?
When the Council allocates land in the Local Plan, it’s basically saying:
“We’re trusting you to build here — not just sometime, but within a reasonable window.”
But what if that land just sits there for years, unused?
A site deallocation policy gives EHDC the power to say:
“You’ve had enough time. You didn’t deliver. We’re giving someone else a chance.”
🧭 How Does It Work?
- EHDC writes into the Local Plan: “If no application is made within 3 years of adoption, this site may be deallocated.”
- They check each year in the AMR.
- If no progress — they issue a warning.
- If still no progress — the site can be replaced in the next plan review.
🎯 Why Does It Matter?
Without this power:
- Developers can treat allocations like long-term investments, not promises,
- Sites sit undeveloped while others fight to get land,
- Local trust in planning collapses.
✅ Final Thought
This is about consequences.
“If you’re not serious about delivery, you lose the privilege of allocation.”
That helps reward proactive builders and deter speculative land holders.