Despite making up only 1.76% of the district’s population, Medstead absorbed 8.36% of all new housing in the 2011–2021 period.
This shows a development burden over four times higher than what would be expected if housing were distributed in proportion to population size.
📌 This is strong, quantitative evidence that development in Medstead was not proportionate. It supports arguments about infrastructure strain, planning fairness, and unsustainable growth at the local level.
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed